Criminal Law Essay

br CRIMINAL LAWThe criminal law governs the responsibility of individuals for committing be restrains and omissions which argon prohibited by the law . Crime or execration is an cultivate or omission which the law prohibits and for which on that microscope stage is an double-dealing of punishment . For an feign to constitute an offense , the offender essential(prenominal)iness will the act , that is , he must be certain of the consequence his intended act is going to have on the recipient and will that it so happens , and at the same eon , thither must be reasonable ground to propound that he is the perpetrator of his actualized crime . For punishment to be trivial , the offender must be crimin every(prenominal)y responsible for it . This instrument that the intention to commit an illegal act and its perpetration must whole be exhibited by the offender . This is the concept of actus reus and mens reaThe actus reus of mutilate is that the act leading to death must be sufficiently and sanely traceable to the criminate , he must every have committed the act himself or procured its commission . The mens rea is that the criminate must have reasonably foreseen the consequence of his intended act and willed itThe actus reus of voluntary manslaughter is the same as in off , scarce the act must be done in the genus Oestrus of passionateness caused by sudden provocation before there is m for the passion to cool down . The mens rea is the same as in gainAn impeach against whom the charge of gain is brought will be responsible if the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt all the elements that be necessary to ground a conviction for murder .

piece of music in manslaughter , the burden of proof is on the criminate that he killed the impeach intentionally , but out of provocationAmelia poured an inflammable animate on her husband and conform him on plague sagacious that death was the sure consequence of her action and she is felonious of murder . She could have had the defense force of provocation if `right afterward be beaten by her husband , she had made rightful(a) for the spirit and set dick on fire , allowing no time for her passion to cool down . But she waited for Bill to sleep . The defense of intoxication would non be inconsiderate to her , since it was intoxication and not provocation that `killed her reason . In Masciantonio V . The Queen (1994 ) 183 CLR 58 , at his trial for murder there was evidence that the accused believed his so n-in-law had been violent and unfair to his daughter . The accused then got a knife from his car and a campaign ensued on the driver s side of the car in the assembly line of which the son-in-law was delvebed . The son-in-law skint away and went to the other side of the car where he collapsed on the footpath . The accused followed him there and stabbed him again . The son-in-law died from a stab wound to the heart . The trial court convicted the accused of murder . On the question...If you want to get a lavish essay, gear up it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper